01 / Listen · Library02 / Atlas · Library

Focus sounds

The sound that helps most while working is a steady one that covers distracting speech: pink or brown noise, a distant café murmur, a flat drone. For reading the picks are wordless and calm, for coding they are regular. Evidence that the sound itself improves focus is weak and conflicting; each card shows its level of evidence.

For reading

Wordless, low and even: sounds that stay in the background so attention stays on the text.

All in the Atlas (7)

For writing

A little more alive: slowly changing melody, lo-fi and morning nature.

For coding

Regular and long: server-room hum, a dark drone, a soft pulse.

Sounds that cover speech

For an open office or studying: flat noise that is strong in the speech band. The evidence for masking is on the card.

Getting ready for a task

Short sounds for the few minutes before you start; the evidence is weak, as the card says.

Reading and tools

Evidence

This page has no evidence level of its own; each sound's level is on its card. A summary of the related claims:

  • Broadband noise and masking

    Continuous noise probably makes surrounding sounds less noticeable.

    Evidence level B: Moderate evidenceReviewed 09/10/2026

    What don't we know? It is not clear that masking translates into protected sleep: in a 25-person lab study, adding pink noise to intermittent environmental noise worsened sleep structure further, and earplugs worked better.

    Findings and sources
  • Speech masking in open-plan offices

    The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of masking sound on work performance in open-plan offices, and the effect depends on the masker type and level.

    Evidence level D: Insufficient evidenceReviewed 09/10/2026For information onlyDraft · awaiting review, not used in suggestions

    What don't we know? The evidence rests on a single small lab experiment; results may differ in real offices and other languages.

    Findings and sources
  • Binaural beats, focus and memory

    Evidence is weak and conflicting; in some studies binaural beats lowered test performance.

    Evidence level C: Preliminary/mixed evidenceReviewed 07/10/2026

    What don't we know? Results conflict.

    Findings and sources
  • Binaural beats before a task

    Listening to binaural beats before a task may give better results than listening only during it.

    Evidence level C: Preliminary/mixed evidenceReviewed 09/10/2026

    What don't we know? This rests on a moderator comparison within one meta-analysis; few experiments test the question directly, and in a small experiment that directly varied onset time, results were mixed.

    Findings and sources

How evidence levels are assigned: Evidence methodology